2 ms·
Insult or not, well-meaning movements are often hijacked and co-opted by corporations and governments. Women's lib is just one example. People are often not gi
by EGreg 3y ago
Insult or not, well-meaning movements are often hijacked and co-opted by corporations and governments. Women's lib is just one example.
People are often not given a choice, individually or even collectively. For example when Crimea overwhelmingly (94%) voted in 1991 to be independent of Ukraine, no one honored it. Then 6 months later they voted 54% for Ukraine to be independent of USSR, and that was taken as them wanting to be part of Ukraine. Then in 2014, the only choices given were be part of Ukraine, or be part of Russia. They never again got to vote for independence in a referendum, as Montenegro or Kosovo did. Kurds and Catalonians voted for independence in 2017, but none of that was honored. Uyghurs, Rohingya, Palestinians and many others are stateless. In short, people are usually just kicked around by whatever system the governments set up. And similarly with corporations, though it's more voluntary, it's still a system. As a young woman, to declare that you aspire to be a mother and homemaker, is something of an oddity and peer pressure is strong at formative young years. I wouldn't say most young people are really making "their own choices" statistically speaking, and in any case, the choices society has collectively made has led people psychologically to be more miserable across the board, and we are using medication as a way to treat the symptoms.
I could be wrong. Perhaps today's women are actually happier than their grandmothers ever were. But it doesn't seem to be borne out in the data. And I think it has to do with the labor market.
https://law.yale.edu/sites/default/files/documents/pdf/Intellectual_Life/Stevenson_ParadoxDecliningFemaleHappiness_Dec08.pdf https://law.yale.edu/sites/default/files/documents/pdf/Intel...
https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2016/may/18/womens-rights-happiness-wellbeing-gender-gap https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2016/may/18/womens-...
I should say that the USSR has enfranchised women much earlier than USA, and given them equal rights to jobs much earlier. It's hard to me to gauge whether people there were happier by the 1990s (fall of USSR) than people in USA are today (we may be reaching a breaking point here as well).
- seec 3y agoAll of this is pretty obvious to anyone that takes some time to actually observe what is going on. But we are currently under a very strong political ideology that has replaced what was previously called a religion. You can't say those things and nobody will agree publicly (even if they think alike) until the whole thing falls appart... To be honest it won't take much longer, because this system by itself creates poisonous inter sex competition that ensure a very low level of reproduction. The numbers are already in. So, either it gets replaced by alternative ways of organizing society (it's already somewhat happening in some places, the problem is the alternatives are a lot less nice) or some spark ignites a revolt that brings back some balance. But from where I stand it's probably over already. Nobody seems to question having both sex/parents working (and often competing for the same job!) and women definitely do not want to take the breadwinner role after somewhat refusing the homemaker role. But that's very consistent with reality of interacting with women. In my opinion any society that start to listen to the infinite demands of women is doomed to failure. I don't have much to bet but so far, I'm winning...