4 ms·
"As soon as the funding closed Facebook was suddenly facing a viable threat in mobile vs. just another resource-starved startup hanging onto dear life." You ar
by larrys 15y ago
"As soon as the funding closed Facebook was suddenly facing a viable threat in mobile vs. just another resource-starved startup hanging onto dear life."
You are stating that like it's a fait accompli that the threat is real and a done deal as opposed to a mountain that they have to continue to climb and achieve with all sorts of things that could cause the dream (after $500m funding) to not even happen.
Perhaps it's the same bias on the part of Facebook that caused them to make this acquisition and overreact (possibly - and of course we'll never know the answer) to Instagram's funding.
And what about the fact that they waited until they were funded as opposed to having a system in place to identify the threat from "just another resource-starved startup hanging onto dear life" and getting involved before that?
- jen_h 15y agoOne thing I haven't seen anyone mention is that, depending on the stock vs. cash split (I guess we'll see in the S-1 eventually), the acquisition not only knocks out a potentual competitor/keeps bigger competitors away from Instagram, gains a talented team and a cool product, but also acts as a pre-IPO liquidation event. Instagram now has at least ~10% of Facebook's 2011 revenue banked.