3 ms·
Mass is of a single particle is extremely small (proton has a mass of 1.6e-27 kg), speed is very high and already very close to the speed of light at all but th
by maxnoe 3y ago
Mass is of a single particle is extremely small (proton has a mass of 1.6e-27 kg), speed is very high and already very close to the speed of light at all but the lowest energies, so gravity "assists" are not really anything with which you can gain energy.
These are charged particles (protons and fully ionized heavier nuclei), so electromagnetism is a much more efficient way to reach high energies.
All currently proposed mechanisms for cosmic ray acceleration involve turbulent plasmas and shock fronts that reflect particles magnetically, giving them a small bump in energy each time [1] or rotating magnetic fields [2] in sufficiently extreme environments.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fermi_acceleration https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fermi_acceleration
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Centrifugal_acceleration_(astrophysics) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Centrifugal_acceleration_(astr...
Gravity just doesn't play a direct role for accelerating charged particles, it's much too weak compared to the electromagnetic force for a charged particle.
- saiya-jin 3y agoSo, a pulsar would do the trick? How far back do we simulate movement of milky way and all galaxies around to say for sure they come from an 'empty' place? I think our local supercluster look quite a bit different say 1 billion years ago
- eesmith 3y agoThe particle is traveling at a whisker under the speed of light. If I read things correctly, it's only a few light-days behind what the light would be after 1 billion years. So what we see should (as we we understand it) look like the conditions where/when it achieved its tremendous speed.
- saiya-jin 3y agoThank you for the explanation it makes sense (I wonder how much time that particle 'experienced'), apart from that obvious mystery of where it came from