I agree nuclear initial investment is high but it’s cheaper to maintain in the long run than renewables. The making of solar panels, wind turbines and hydroelec

I agree nuclear initial investment is high but it’s cheaper to maintain in the long run than renewables. The making of solar panels, wind turbines and hydroelectric power stations release more carbon in the athmosphere than nuclear sites. Making of this stuff, especially batteries for stocking, produce more poisonous material than any nuclear site will, and must be stocked underground with high risks. Exaust fission materials produced by humanity so far is so little that stocking isn’t a problem and in some kind of reactors can even be recycled! Renewables don’t guarantee power continuity, nuclear fission does. I can go on the whole day, renewables alone can’t power the ever increasing world need. A mix of nuclear reactors, even small, and renewables could