4 ms·
The “AI” is just the visual stills. A human still has to craft the strategy, write the content, feed the model new fashion and generally be “influential”. At t
by rib3ye 3y ago
The “AI” is just the visual stills. A human still has to craft the strategy, write the content, feed the model new fashion and generally be “influential”.
At the moment, it seems like a net loss.
- spacecadet 3y agoAlso, Im all for "AI", but in my logic this is fraud.
- mensetmanusman 3y agoThis is just what the post truth world looks like. All audio, video, and photography will be suspect and assumed to be AI in the next decade. I wonder if humanity will regret the change in the coming decades.
- thfuran 3y agoI already do.
- whynotmaybe 3y agoWhere's then frontier between marketing and fraud when using simple tools like Photoshop? Those skin product ad where the image of the skin is so flawless should be classified as fraud. But soon it won't be photoshopped because the flawless skin would have been generated by some AI just like some ads that use 3d avatars.
- spacecadet 3y agoMy partner is a professional photographer with large brand beauty clients, so I know all to well the extent of change from the raw image to the final release... To me, its a fine line, and just because some monkey wants to toy with photoshop as a career doesn't mean they can ignore all ethics. More so after all we have learned about the FRAUD of self worth and body image being pushed on young people, particularly young women.