3 ms·
I worked remotely for 12 years. Here's how I perceived the experience. Most of that time I only had to deal with phone + powerpoint conferences. That worked ju
by david-gpu 3y ago
I worked remotely for 12 years. Here's how I perceived the experience.
Most of that time I only had to deal with phone + powerpoint conferences. That worked just fine for me.
COVID hit and management decided that not turning on our webcams was wrong in some way. I personally hated it; found it stressful and couldn't see the upside. Meeting in person is a much experience than that.
One on one Zoom meetings were different. There's a clear line of communication and I did't mind seeing the other person. Not that it added much, frankly, but it was fine.
All that said, I didn't feel that zoom vs phone was the main differentiator between a good and a bad environment for remote work (for me, anyway). The key difference was whether most of the decision making was communicated in writing or not. Even something simple like email is easily searchable and leaves a clear record of what was decided and why. Good luck searching a web meeting done three months ago.
- ravenstine 3y agoCompanies would save countless employee hours by making announcements in writing. The idea that the entire staff needs to be online at the same time window to learn what's going on is an extension of "butts in seats" and, from what I can surmise, is purely ego driven.
- djtango 3y agothere are tiers of fidelity when delivering communications. The highest is one on one. The lowest is a short whatsapp. The lower the fidelity the easier it is for the same message to be misinterpreted. I don't particularly like sitting in long meetings but I appreciate that more can be communicated the higher the bandwidth of the medium