3 ms·
Seems hard to catch at an audit. Surely he just used the stolen code as reference and didn't re-use entire files containing "Copyright by Valeo". If he would h
by KeplerBoy 3y ago
Seems hard to catch at an audit. Surely he just used the stolen code as reference and didn't re-use entire files containing "Copyright by Valeo".
If he would have been any smarter, he would have kept the stolen files on a private computer and he would have gotten away with it.
- juunpp 3y agoThe article mentions the directory containing the files was still named as it was in Valeo. If he didn't bother renaming the path, I'm not sure he bothered removing the copyright.