>One also has to understand when Indy was born. 15 and 25 may not have been too far apart, for someone born in the late 1800s. And the woman's father was around

>One also has to understand when Indy was born. 15 and 25 may not have been too far apart, for someone born in the late 1800s. And the woman's father was around, I believe, at the time. sure, but the writers weren't writing at that time and they weren't arguing well, the proper historical age division would be X and Y but rather hmm, let's make it a bit salacious here, Indy is naughty!