That's true. But on the other hand, imagine this situation: 3 teams with 3 people. The house has 7 br. 2 teams each buy 3 br (for a total of 6 of the 7 bein

That's true. But on the other hand, imagine this situation: 3 teams with 3 people. The house has 7 br. 2 teams each buy 3 br (for a total of 6 of the 7 being used), then the other team buys 1 br, and they all always work from and hang out at the house. It would be lame that that 3rd team was paying 1/3rd the cost of each of the other teams. So this formulation was an attempt to account for that. Basically, my theory is--be reasonable. If you're using 42% of the house, you should pay 42% of the costs. I'm happy to adjust the costs to make it work out in a reasonable way.