3 ms·
> "A major implication of our study is that videoconferencing should be considered as a possible complement to face-to-face interaction, but not as a substitute
by ryanjshaw 3y ago
> "A major implication of our study is that videoconferencing should be considered as a possible complement to face-to-face interaction, but not as a substitute," the authors wrote.
Why the assumption that seeing faces is valuable at all in a lecture? Where is the "no video" result?
- smt88 3y agoI thought that was strange too, but I wonder if it was to reduce the number of variables. They wanted an experience as close to an in-person lecture as possible, but using Zoom. Also if faces can be hidden, the lecture might as well be recorded and sent to students.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]