> It's good enough […] «Good enough» is not a quantative metric by any conceivable measure. Furthermore, people in surrounding threads have reported inadequate

> It's good enough […] «Good enough» is not a quantative metric by any conceivable measure. Furthermore, people in surrounding threads have reported inadequate performance of the pg_vector PgSQL extension (which, indubitably, can and will be fixed at some point). An example of a useful quantative metric would: «compared to alternative vector processing/indexing engines/databases A, B and C and a dataset comprising N inputs and a total size of S Mb/Gb/Tb and using the M, N and P use cases in the performance testing scenario and pg_vector being the performance baseline, the following results have been obtained: X, Y and Z» – do you have anything similar to that you could share? Not only the comparison results would be insightful, they could also feed into someone's decision making process of whether X should be favoured over Y. > […] and only going to get better. Beyond doubt, it will. In the future. But people need to solve problems in the present.