3 ms·
Companies of this size have routine code audits that would find copyright infringements of this sort. If the employee literally brought in source code files and
by juunpp 3y ago
Companies of this size have routine code audits that would find copyright infringements of this sort. If the employee literally brought in source code files and not even change the name of the directory like it was highlighted here, it'd have been caught. The audit is also not conducted by the manager, but a third party. There is no possible way this would fly unless the individual intentionally stripped the source of copyright notices (the individual's fault), or the source code was just sitting on their laptop and never acted upon, etc.
So I think the question (and I'm not a lawyer...) is whether Nvidia conducted such audit and to what extent (if any) the other company's source code was merged into theirs (versus just sitting on the laptop).
- KeplerBoy 3y agoSeems hard to catch at an audit. Surely he just used the stolen code as reference and didn't re-use entire files containing "Copyright by Valeo". If he would have been any smarter, he would have kept the stolen files on a private computer and he would have gotten away with it.
- juunpp 3y agoThe article mentions the directory containing the files was still named as it was in Valeo. If he didn't bother renaming the path, I'm not sure he bothered removing the copyright.