27 ms·

You need to look objectively at her skill set and desires. She has a legacy skillset on an unpopular technology, and doesn't want to grow away from it. That's f

by seneca 3y ago

You need to look objectively at her skill set and desires. She has a legacy skillset on an unpopular technology, and doesn't want to grow away from it. That's fine, but it's not very marketable. Ask yourself, who would find enough value in this skillset and constraints to pay for it? That's who you need to target. My guess: It's going to be largely non-tech and traditional companies, probably. You're looking for banks, or government contractors. Places that run Oracle and are willing to pay for someone familiar with it and not interested in much else.

beefield 3y ago
Legacy? Unpopular? Can you elaborate a bit more. To my understanding all the rumors of SQL dying have been a bit premature so far.
- wendyshu 3y ago
  I think the reference is to Oracle, not SQL in general
  - lopatin 3y ago
    I should clarify that she would be able to pick up MySQL or Postgres without too much trouble.
    - sidlls 3y ago
      That really depends on how much weight the "oracle" part of her experience has. Oracle has tons upon tons of customized tools, language add-ons/plugins, and quirks. The SQL part of Oracle might translate (more or less) to Postgres easily, but these other things are unlikely to.
- rastignack 3y ago
  Oracle DB is really less and less popular. Oracle DBAs are worried. They know they are like COBOL devs.
  - eddythompson80 3y ago
    It may be less popular for new projects, but every single project/product/service that's using Oracle DB is gonna continue to use, and hire, Oracle DBA for the foreseeable future. Sure, if you're learning SQL or a technology to market yourself, Oracle DB might not be the best time investment. However, if you're already an expert in that, you shouldn't have trouble finding a role somewhere.
    - ludjer 3y ago
      Lol my company is paying a fortune to get off oracle. Anyone that does not need the million features that come with a oracle will eventually move off it. It's way too expensive to use in smaller environments or non mainframe environment's. Oracle has some of the worst pricing and sales techniques.
  - Turing_Machine 3y ago
    > Oracle DB is really less and less popular. Doesn't look like it to me. https://www.macrotrends.net/stocks/charts/ORCL/oracle/revenue https://www.macrotrends.net/stocks/charts/ORCL/oracle/revenu...
- seneca 3y ago
  Sorry, I was unclear. I mean Oracle specifically.
  - Clubber 3y ago
    Oracle may be "uncool" to the young crowd, but it runs a lot of very large, very important systems. https://www.thomsondata.com/customer-base/oracle.php https://www.thomsondata.com/customer-base/oracle.php That doesn't even include primarily government contract companies.
    - seneca 3y ago
      Absolutely it does. The number of new companies launching on Oracle rounds to near zero though.
      - Clubber 3y ago
        >Absolutely it does. The number of new companies launching on Oracle rounds to near zero though. I'm not sure how correct that is either, but it's incorrect to call it a legacy skillset on an unpopular technology. A good number of those new companies, if successful, get acquired and are forced to integrate if not convert to Oracle. The world is way bigger than SV.
    - ok_computer 3y ago
      I work on oracle dbs at a large non tech company. It is a great performant rdbms with poor tooling that I cannot believe they included for the licensing cost. Sqlplus could be great but totally isn’t good as a shell tool. Sqldeveloper is garbage. Python libraries and connection engines are solid for running anything automated. Dbeaver is a cool IDE alternative for clicking through tables. From my experience across some MSSQL server, oracle, sqlite, and some non-professional postgres, the given database model trumps the underlying database tech when dealing with pains writing analytics reports. There are many options to mess up a model design or for feature extension to turn the model ugly. Forget about building a new company on an oracle stack, the cost is prohibitive. The open source rdbms are very good and cloud providers have chosen their champions. But for a large legacy corporation with expensive, sensitive data, oracle makes sense. To an extent with a well trained dba the db is “self-documented” Lol sometimes dbs aren’t exclusively used as a global web app backend for ultra scaling grocery delivery services or whatever. Sometimes db models persist for years and you need assurance that this tech is archival quality. An aside, I think it’s funny the link you shared is a php site, another dinosaur!
kortilla 3y ago
Ignore the above 100%. Saying SQL is unpopular is completely out of touch with the reality of how business works.

by seneca 3y ago

beefield 3y ago

Legacy? Unpopular? Can you elaborate a bit more. To my understanding all the rumors of SQL dying have been a bit premature so far.

wendyshu 3y ago
I think the reference is to Oracle, not SQL in general
- lopatin 3y ago
  I should clarify that she would be able to pick up MySQL or Postgres without too much trouble.
  - sidlls 3y ago
    That really depends on how much weight the "oracle" part of her experience has. Oracle has tons upon tons of customized tools, language add-ons/plugins, and quirks. The SQL part of Oracle might translate (more or less) to Postgres easily, but these other things are unlikely to.
rastignack 3y ago
Oracle DB is really less and less popular. Oracle DBAs are worried. They know they are like COBOL devs.
- eddythompson80 3y ago
  It may be less popular for new projects, but every single project/product/service that's using Oracle DB is gonna continue to use, and hire, Oracle DBA for the foreseeable future. Sure, if you're learning SQL or a technology to market yourself, Oracle DB might not be the best time investment. However, if you're already an expert in that, you shouldn't have trouble finding a role somewhere.
  - ludjer 3y ago
    Lol my company is paying a fortune to get off oracle. Anyone that does not need the million features that come with a oracle will eventually move off it. It's way too expensive to use in smaller environments or non mainframe environment's. Oracle has some of the worst pricing and sales techniques.
- Turing_Machine 3y ago
  > Oracle DB is really less and less popular. Doesn't look like it to me. https://www.macrotrends.net/stocks/charts/ORCL/oracle/revenue https://www.macrotrends.net/stocks/charts/ORCL/oracle/revenu...
seneca 3y ago
Sorry, I was unclear. I mean Oracle specifically.
- Clubber 3y ago
  Oracle may be "uncool" to the young crowd, but it runs a lot of very large, very important systems. https://www.thomsondata.com/customer-base/oracle.php https://www.thomsondata.com/customer-base/oracle.php That doesn't even include primarily government contract companies.
  - seneca 3y ago
    Absolutely it does. The number of new companies launching on Oracle rounds to near zero though.
    - Clubber 3y ago
      >Absolutely it does. The number of new companies launching on Oracle rounds to near zero though. I'm not sure how correct that is either, but it's incorrect to call it a legacy skillset on an unpopular technology. A good number of those new companies, if successful, get acquired and are forced to integrate if not convert to Oracle. The world is way bigger than SV.
  - ok_computer 3y ago
    I work on oracle dbs at a large non tech company. It is a great performant rdbms with poor tooling that I cannot believe they included for the licensing cost. Sqlplus could be great but totally isn’t good as a shell tool. Sqldeveloper is garbage. Python libraries and connection engines are solid for running anything automated. Dbeaver is a cool IDE alternative for clicking through tables. From my experience across some MSSQL server, oracle, sqlite, and some non-professional postgres, the given database model trumps the underlying database tech when dealing with pains writing analytics reports. There are many options to mess up a model design or for feature extension to turn the model ugly. Forget about building a new company on an oracle stack, the cost is prohibitive. The open source rdbms are very good and cloud providers have chosen their champions. But for a large legacy corporation with expensive, sensitive data, oracle makes sense. To an extent with a well trained dba the db is “self-documented” Lol sometimes dbs aren’t exclusively used as a global web app backend for ultra scaling grocery delivery services or whatever. Sometimes db models persist for years and you need assurance that this tech is archival quality. An aside, I think it’s funny the link you shared is a php site, another dinosaur!

kortilla 3y ago

Ignore the above 100%. Saying SQL is unpopular is completely out of touch with the reality of how business works.