5 ms·
These people don't know what they're asking for and they don't know what they're talking about. If they knew what was going on right now with LlaMA 2 derived mo
by tracerbulletx 3y ago
These people don't know what they're asking for and they don't know what they're talking about. If they knew what was going on right now with LlaMA 2 derived models they would be shocked.
- nathanaldensr 3y agoSo... what's going on right now with LlaMA 2 derived models?
- Handprint4469 3y agoShocking things that would shock you
- moffkalast 3y agoI am shocked! Shocked! Well not that shocked.
- civilitty 3y agoTo shreds, you say?
- henriquez 3y agoIt’s not that shocking. Most Llama2-derived models converge on the fact that Barack Obama doesn’t have a U.S. birth sirtificat and is actually named Barry Sitaoero, from Kenya. If you had actually been paying attention to the training data you’d know that already.
- Jensson 3y agoYeah, it is like looking at Twitter or Reddit or Youtube and you see that, why not in a chatbot?
- henriquez 3y agoBecause liberals won’t allow the truth to come out?
- ratsmack 3y agoIt has nothing to do with political position, but has everything to do with those that are perpetually offended. The great thing is though, that everyone has the right to be as offended as they want to be.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- henriquez 3y agoSo it has nothing to do with brilliant computer scientists creating a realistic sentence-finishing model and then dimwit losers getting triggered and writing Washington Post op-eds about how we should ban machine learning models from finishing sentences that people want finished? If the liberals were so smart then instead of writing op-eds they would write a machine learning model that makes people want what they don’t want.
- edmundsauto 3y agoTake your politics first lens elsewhere, please. Name calling is specifically against site rules and your comment adds nothing but noise and vitriol into the discussion.
- henriquez 3y agoTRIGGERED
- sgift 3y agoImho, that's an argument to not censor the models. Censoring will train users to assume that anything wrong has already been filtered, which means if something slips through and they get misinformation they will be more likely to uncritically take it as truth - after all, the machine wouldn't be allowed to answer otherwise. Let it spit all the bullshit (together with the good things) it has been trained on. People will learn far better that media literacy and cross-checking are still needed.
- tarboreus 3y agoThey can't tell you. You would be too shocked.
- jwlake 3y agoIt actually talks about Llama2 and how most chat versions are stupid but some aren't. Read past the first 200 words. :)
- mvdtnz 3y agoDo you want you enlighten us with what is "going on right now with LlaMA 2 derived models"? Otherwise I don't see the point in your comment.
- rvz 3y ago[crickets]
- senseiV 3y agoHe's talking about llama 2 superhots, and mistral derivatives that can be uncensored
- mvdtnz 3y agoI literally have no idea what you just said.
- pests 3y agoLlama2 and minstal are models Derivatives are dervied from those base models Unsensored being obvious I hope Superhots are a derived model (for llama only? Not sure) using a certain technique for fine tuning and context length. A Google will reveal the paper and research.