3 ms·

I'm not sure what the point of this analysis is. That Twitter is wrapping each and every URL, however short, is a known fact. And since people are using differe

I'm not sure what the point of this analysis is. That Twitter is wrapping each and every URL, however short, is a known fact. And since people are using different URL shorteners, URLs are bound to be re-wrapped when a tweet is retweeted.

ewencp 15y ago
Right, it isn't that surprising. I was originally motivated by the general question of how many URL shorteners you have to hop through to get to sites from Twitter. What this doesn't show is as interesting as what it does: other URL shorteners seem to be behaving well since they haven't increased the rate of re-wrapping already short URLs, including services like Facebook where you might expect they would do so for the same reasons Twitter does. But to really answer your question, I didn't intend to make a particular point -- I collected the data to answer a question and then dug in a bit more to see if I could find anything else interesting.
Terretta 15y ago
It's a known fact, but nevertheless annoying that Twitter URL LENGTHENS, and annoying that Twitter thinks it's ok to rebrand publisher shorteners like nyti.ms or tcrn.ch which help users recognize where the redirect will take them.
- saurik 15y ago
  Twitter even shortens things that you didn't intend users to be clicking through; it you want to tell people to connect to your IRC server or want to talk about a host name redirection issue, you're screwed.
- justincormack 15y ago
  But these publisher specific shorteners no longer serve any function surely. They were because you had to use a shortener, so they created their own. Now everything goes through t.co you effectively do not need a shortener yourself. For your own site you get no more analytic data from a shortener than a real url.
  - Terretta 15y ago
    I don't generally use sharing services; I email links while reading the page. I like emailing a link that I know doesn't line break. That just needs to be less than 70 chars, but many news sites are longer. So as long as they're shortening, might as well shorten for all venues. Twitter's shortener is useless in this direct sharing case. Another publisher specific function is, as I mentioned, letting a user know through your branded short URL what this shortened link is likely to take them to.

ewencp 15y ago

Right, it isn't that surprising. I was originally motivated by the general question of how many URL shorteners you have to hop through to get to sites from Twitter. What this doesn't show is as interesting as what it does: other URL shorteners seem to be behaving well since they haven't increased the rate of re-wrapping already short URLs, including services like Facebook where you might expect they would do so for the same reasons Twitter does. But to really answer your question, I didn't intend to make a particular point -- I collected the data to answer a question and then dug in a bit more to see if I could find anything else interesting.

Terretta 15y ago

It's a known fact, but nevertheless annoying that Twitter URL LENGTHENS, and annoying that Twitter thinks it's ok to rebrand publisher shorteners like nyti.ms or tcrn.ch which help users recognize where the redirect will take them.

saurik 15y ago
Twitter even shortens things that you didn't intend users to be clicking through; it you want to tell people to connect to your IRC server or want to talk about a host name redirection issue, you're screwed.
justincormack 15y ago
But these publisher specific shorteners no longer serve any function surely. They were because you had to use a shortener, so they created their own. Now everything goes through t.co you effectively do not need a shortener yourself. For your own site you get no more analytic data from a shortener than a real url.
- Terretta 15y ago
  I don't generally use sharing services; I email links while reading the page. I like emailing a link that I know doesn't line break. That just needs to be less than 70 chars, but many news sites are longer. So as long as they're shortening, might as well shorten for all venues. Twitter's shortener is useless in this direct sharing case. Another publisher specific function is, as I mentioned, letting a user know through your branded short URL what this shortened link is likely to take them to.