I think what this article is missing is “the chart DK should have used.” Instead we get a spurious explanation that doesn’t make a lot of sense based on comple

I think what this article is missing is “the chart DK should have used.” Instead we get a spurious explanation that doesn’t make a lot of sense based on completely fabricated data. It’s entirely natural for something that looks like DK to emerge from randomized data, especially when the Y axis is represented by some number of the mean (actually 50ish in this case).