4 ms·
This is correct, but replace 1.9.2-p290 with 1.9.3-p125.
by getsat 15y ago
This is correct, but replace 1.9.2-p290 with 1.9.3-p125.
- telemachos 14y agoPlus falcon patches? Here's a ruby-build formula for that: $ cat share/ruby-build/1.9.3-p125-falcon ## Hat tip to @burkelibbey and @metaskills - who did all the real work build_package_combined_patch() { local package_name="$1" { curl https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/47.diff | git apply curl https://raw.github.com/gist/1859082/performance_and_backport_gc.patch | patch -p1 autoconf ./configure --prefix="$PREFIX_PATH" $CONFIGURE_OPTS make -j 8 make install } >&4 2>&1 } CC=$(which clang) install_package "yaml-0.1.4" "http://pyyaml.org/download/libyaml/yaml-0.1.4.tar.gz" CC=$(which clang) install_package "ruby-1.9.3-p125" "http://ftp.ruby-lang.org/pub/ruby/1.9/ruby-1.9.3-p125.tar.gz" combined_patch
- getsat 14y agoThere's this gist which combines all the patches and has you install a 1.9.3-p125-perf via rbenv: https://gist.github.com/2113359 https://gist.github.com/2113359 Been using it at work for local dev and in production. Feels good, man.