I don't have an opinion on this case, but after reading the comments, I'm wondering if this case is possible: 1 She is a legitimate victim of cyberstalking, wi

I don't have an opinion on this case, but after reading the comments, I'm wondering if this case is possible: 1 She is a legitimate victim of cyberstalking, with a legitimate beef against Kickstarter 2 She is also an opportunist, using #1 to generate publicity for her project 3 Kickstarter could/should have handled this differently/better For me, I get the impression from the responses here that some think that #1 and #2 above are mutually exclusive, when it's possible they may not be. If #2 is true, it doesn't in my mind invalidate #1 and #3, but it could make me less sympathetic to her cause. I'm not sure we should draw any conclusions based on a blog post from only one side of the 'dispute' (Kickstarter hasn't stated their side), but it's interesting to me how polarizing her blog entry is in this thread.