2 ms·
> Jack of all trades, master of none, but oftentimes better than master of one. Your own words contradict themselves. A master of none is never better than a m
by ryao 3y ago
> Jack of all trades, master of none, but oftentimes better than master of one.
Your own words contradict themselves. A master of none is never better than a master of one. None means there is no case of being better.
- pjmlp 3y agohttps://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jack_of_all_trades https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jack_of_all_trades
- ryao 3y agoThere was a time when you could know everything there was to know. Those times are long gone. To give an example, Carl Friedrich Gauss was the last one to know all of mathematics and physics. The idea of a renaissance man who could be a master of all things is long dead.
- pjmlp 3y agoAnother eristic found on the Web.