Using the origin-story* of a language to argue against what the language can be used for now is never a good argument. Go is a powerful, accessible language. I

Using the origin-story* of a language to argue against what the language can be used for now is never a good argument. Go is a powerful, accessible language. It yields highly optimized, tight binary output targeting a wide variety of platforms and systems. Why not Go? Python is basically a non-starter in this space. Your other example is a scripting language inside an engine. These seem orthogonal. * - Which is oft heavily editorialized and fictitious, such as in this case