3 ms·

Oh fragmentation fun. I use RawTherapee. Seems to be less of a shit show. And I'm not giving Adobe my money.

• hef19898 3y ago
  I don't care about developer beef at open spurce peojects. I don't care neither about the techical finesse behind software or tools I use. What I care about is the results from using said tools. And so far, darktable doesn't disappoint. ansel propably won't neither.
  • baz00 3y ago
    I do care because I've seen a few projects burn through politics.
    • trop 3y ago
      What we're seeing here is one embittered ex-developer spending time/effort saying toxic things about their former collaborators in a public forum. At the same time the former developer is making a claim to such radical competence that they can somehow keep an open source project of considerable scope together -- one which until now was coded by generally at least half a dozen committed authors at any given time. The darktable project was originated by some quite bright folks. Others have cycled in/out over the years. Generally without too much drama. It's too bad to be giving so much attention to divisive claims.
      • chris_wot 3y ago
        Some of the code he pointed out is dreadful.
        • hef19898 3y ago
          As I said, the results work for me, so I couldn't care less about the code.
          • chris_wot 3y ago
            You don't need to debug it.
• Pomfers 3y ago
  My choice as well. I like the colors my camera puts out mostly, so I only really need to make a few adjustments here and there. DarkTable doesn't even conform the RAW to the preview JPEG, so I end up wasting a bunch of time just getting the RAW to look normal in the first place. RawTherapee also seemed far more intuitive to figure out.
• akho 3y ago
  RawTherapee has ART.