3 ms·
Poking fun at the bad phrase. There was no dumb in that choice. The reality is the author dismissed Apple supporting side loading as fundamentally impossible i
by Guvante 3y ago
Poking fun at the bad phrase. There was no dumb in that choice.
The reality is the author dismissed Apple supporting side loading as fundamentally impossible in a thread talking about how Apple should offer more choices.
Calling users dumb for wanting side loading on Apple is ridiculous on its face. Users didn't choose Apple to side load they might have sacrificed side loading to get Apple but calling them dumb for making a choice is ridiculous.
Apple makes $86 billion from the App Store a year. That is a quarter of their revenue from iPhone sales. No shot a 25% increase in revenue with phenomenally higher margins isn't of extreme importance to Apple.
- seec 3y agoThis guy is a dangerous zealot. He attacked your "reading comprehension" because he doesn't have any real argument that is not about protecting their trillion dollars master no matter what. It's a bit unreal seeing people like him exist everywhere.