3 ms·

This is the same process ArchiveTeam has used for all their previous work as well and there have been no issues. Isn't a potentially-tampered copy better than

by pests 3y ago

This is the same process ArchiveTeam has used for all their previous work as well and there have been no issues. Isn't a potentially-tampered copy better than none at all?

lopkeny12ko 3y ago
"This vulnerability has always existed and it's never been an issue in the past" is not a very robust approach to security.
- Larrikin 3y ago
  What is your solution that can begin preserving content from today? Tearing into a working solution is easy.
- pests 3y ago
  I hate to be this guy but, go donate some code or time and make it happen?
kelnos 3y ago
> Isn't a potentially-tampered copy better than none at all? I guess it depends on the specific nature of the tampering, but I can think of quite a few situations where no copy is indeed better.
progval 3y ago
It was actually an issue with the Reddit archival, but it wasn't malicious. Some people made changes to the code they thought would make it faster, but actually corrupted results.