> Intel actually did a lot in the last decade. That's the expected case when you have tons of cash and market dominance. > are making a reactionary take about

> Intel actually did a lot in the last decade. That's the expected case when you have tons of cash and market dominance. > are making a reactionary take about the lack of post-Skylake microarchitectures Or about the general inability of large monopolies to effectively compete and continue to deliver according to market expectations. > or years because they care about video games more than safety. And yet, they still had a "server chips" division for much of that time.