3 ms·
Mercurial is (was?) better, but I would actually be really surprised to hear anyone else say that these days. Glad to see it made the bingo board though. Ever
by krupan 3y ago
Mercurial is (was?) better, but I would actually be really surprised to hear anyone else say that these days. Glad to see it made the bingo board though. Everything else on that board I think I have heard (or said myself) in just the last couple weeks. I wonder how much longer we'll all put up with the pain? Git really is a great version control system and it has become incredibly dominate, so it could be a long time.
- yjftsjthsd-h 3y agoMercurial has a better user interface, certainly, though I've warmed to git otherwise. It turns out I really do like being able to rebase, squash, and delete branches (though I keep hearing about bookmarks, so maybe that's obsolete), even if the cli is less friendly.