3 ms·
Well, obviously the overarching concern here is a bottoming-out of nearly every market for labor related to cognitive or creative tasks. And I think you're rig
by jMyles 3y ago
Well, obviously the overarching concern here is a bottoming-out of nearly every market for labor related to cognitive or creative tasks.
And I think you're right: that's coming.
And with it, perhaps the most obvious impetus for rethinking the entire economic configuration of things.
The only way that AI is a doomsday is if, in your imagination, you drag along 20th-century monetary and economic paradigms with it.
People seem to like to be the presence of vibrating strings. I don't think that's subject to deprecation just because people can also have meaningful relationships with AI as a creator of art. In fact, the rapid growth of AI as a provider of passionate musical experiences seems to me likely to grow the palette and appetite for such things, not to shrink it.
- JumpCrisscross 3y ago> I don't think that's subject to deprecation just because people can also have meaningful relationships with AI as a creator of art In large part because of the intellectual property laws you want to disassemble. That’s what creates an economic link between the art and its creator.
- jMyles 3y agoI don't understand: you think that people are coming to my shows, to be in the presence of vibrating strings, as I say, because of some abstract reflex created by the possibility of violence visited upon them as a result of their listening to other musicians? Am I reading this correctly? And I don't think there is evidence that the "economic link between the art and its creator" is strongly correlated to the license used to release the art.