4 ms·
It's just rumours. Everything I've read about that breakthrough sounds about as thoroughly backed in reality as a generic conspiracy theory. There may be a bre
by laserbeam 3y ago
It's just rumours. Everything I've read about that breakthrough sounds about as thoroughly backed in reality as a generic conspiracy theory.
There may be a breakthrough, there may not, but nothing on the topic is convincing or worth reading.
- jordanpg 3y agoRumors that were reported on by a reputable news agency: https://www.reuters.com/technology/sam-altmans-ouster-openai-was-precipitated-by-letter-board-about-ai-breakthrough-2023-11-22/ https://www.reuters.com/technology/sam-altmans-ouster-openai...
- mianos 3y agoThey clarify their own article as unsubstantiated by seconds sources: > Reuters could not independently verify the capabilities of Q* claimed by the researchers. True, they are a reputable news agency, but the parent is also correct, it's not highly credible.
- kypro 3y agoI think you're missing my point. LeCun is saying, "ignore the deluge of complete nonsense" while also saying something to the effect of, "they've probably just created an AI model which can plan". I agree that the reporting on Q* has mostly been nonsense, and I suspect those articles were published just for the clicks, but at the same time this tweet makes zero sense because an AI model which can plan is somewhat concerning so perhaps those articles were on to something?