5 ms·
Bard can read images and, being made by the same company as YouTube, probably has access to high quality video embeddings they use for YouTube search, maybe the
by mattnewton 3y ago
Bard can read images and, being made by the same company as YouTube, probably has access to high quality video embeddings they use for YouTube search, maybe the most sophisticated video search engine on the planet. I don’t know from the article but it could definitely be using the video content directly without a text representation.
For an open source project that actually “sees” videos you can check out https://github.com/PKU-YuanGroup/Video-LLaVA https://github.com/PKU-YuanGroup/Video-LLaVA
- VHRanger 3y ago> maybe the most sophisticated video search engine on the planet And yet youtube search is such garbage most normal users still use google search to search for videos.
- xanderlewis 3y agoReally? What’s particularly bad about it?
- readyplayernull 3y agoFinding only what it's asked for.
- okdood64 3y agoWorks fine for me: https://i.imgur.com/JdxFDfX.jpg https://i.imgur.com/JdxFDfX.jpg https://i.imgur.com/N7Dpb4U.jpg https://i.imgur.com/N7Dpb4U.jpg
- dvngnt_ 3y agoit's okay. I found tiktok to be better as they search brings your current context for suggestions, user's comments are smartly turned into search links, and they do a better job of letting the user search by transcript
- spiderice 3y ago> most normal users still use google search to search for videos. Citation? This seems unlikely to me. Maybe a lot of users end up watching a video given to them by a Google search. But if someone is specifically looking for a video, I think most probably go to YouTube and use YouTube search (which is more than fine for “normal users”)
- Jensson 3y ago> And yet youtube search is such garbage most normal users still use google search to search for videos. They are the same thing at their core, biggest difference is that Youtube started limiting the number of results but has better filtering options.