4 ms·

I’m with you and want more fibre, but people are brutal on hardware. I’ve been involved in the replacement of two fibre optic cables at work, used for pulse ox

I’m with you and want more fibre, but people are brutal on hardware. I’ve been involved in the replacement of two fibre optic cables at work, used for pulse oximetry in an MR scanner. It was very expensive, twice. People force a bend and destroy them. It doesn’t matter what you tell people, they break them.

zamadatix 3y ago
Was in healthcare IT as well: https://www.fs.com/products/41028.html?attribute=35025&id=615202 https://www.fs.com/products/41028.html?attribute=35025&id=61... for a couple of dollars you can get 2 paths of crush protected bend insensitive high speed fiber that barely degrades signal quality when you knot it up. To get around the limitations of the LC connector and wall jacks being regularly obliterated by equipment/tables being moved around use recessed jacks, that way they just pass by instead of break the connector (applies to rj45 as well). We had great success with this approach for a couple thousand locations. Of course, the real problem 95% of the time is really around the device not the technology the device uses. There is a misalignment of incentives on who can work on the device, whether standard parts are used, and whether the approved parts are the $2 type solution that will cost $800 in on site contractor fees to replace again or the $4 solution which actually stands a chance to being used. Once the device is bought nobody is going to be incented or allowed to do anything but fix it to status quo. It's one reason I had to get out of healthcare IT - it was more often the system getting in the way of what patients and nurses needed to do than the actual technology itself so solving things from a technology perspective felt like running on a treadmill and going nowhere.
deleted 3y ago
[deleted]
eurekin 3y ago
I'd go like: "third time, I'm wrapping it in a kiddy pool noodle" for their embarassment
- zamadatix 3y ago
  In my experience they wouldn't even mind or be embarrassed, so long as said solution sounded like it would stay out of the way and let them use the device more conveniently. To them that's the whole point of IT: make it less painful to use the devices how they want to use them to do their job. IT isn't the savior that designs things they want, it's the cost center that makes the things they have to use less annoying to use.

zamadatix 3y ago

Was in healthcare IT as well: https://www.fs.com/products/41028.html?attribute=35025&id=615202 https://www.fs.com/products/41028.html?attribute=35025&id=61... for a couple of dollars you can get 2 paths of crush protected bend insensitive high speed fiber that barely degrades signal quality when you knot it up. To get around the limitations of the LC connector and wall jacks being regularly obliterated by equipment/tables being moved around use recessed jacks, that way they just pass by instead of break the connector (applies to rj45 as well). We had great success with this approach for a couple thousand locations. Of course, the real problem 95% of the time is really around the device not the technology the device uses. There is a misalignment of incentives on who can work on the device, whether standard parts are used, and whether the approved parts are the $2 type solution that will cost $800 in on site contractor fees to replace again or the $4 solution which actually stands a chance to being used. Once the device is bought nobody is going to be incented or allowed to do anything but fix it to status quo. It's one reason I had to get out of healthcare IT - it was more often the system getting in the way of what patients and nurses needed to do than the actual technology itself so solving things from a technology perspective felt like running on a treadmill and going nowhere.

deleted 3y ago

[deleted]

eurekin 3y ago

I'd go like: "third time, I'm wrapping it in a kiddy pool noodle" for their embarassment

zamadatix 3y ago
In my experience they wouldn't even mind or be embarrassed, so long as said solution sounded like it would stay out of the way and let them use the device more conveniently. To them that's the whole point of IT: make it less painful to use the devices how they want to use them to do their job. IT isn't the savior that designs things they want, it's the cost center that makes the things they have to use less annoying to use.