3 ms·
> (and juuuust in case you're going to do the Law Doesn't Say thing again about accepting programming, it doesn't need to. it's already a thing.) In other word
by Volundr 3y ago
> (and juuuust in case you're going to do the Law Doesn't Say thing again about accepting programming, it doesn't need to. it's already a thing.)
In other words your arguing against a hypothetical that only exists in your own mind, and by your own admission, software updates are already and thing and this law already wouldn't be required to issue a software update that disables your car, and this doesn't actually bring us any closer to that.
So already a moot point I guess?
- WarOnPrivacy 3y ago> In other words your arguing against a hypothetical that only exists in your own mind, Considering generations of legislative compulsions to control unliked behavior that is increasingly enabled by Gov's history + means + ever-ratcheting desire for surveillance of every possible person and then allowing those astoundingly plain realities to coalesce into the world's least unlikely outcome [pause] this process of obviousness isn't actually restricted to just my head - as is evidenced by post after post after post on the very same page you're posting to.