4 ms·
I don't think it has to be the fourier transform necessarily. I think the fourier transform might be a really approachable version because it is already in so
by SpaceManNabs 3y ago
I don't think it has to be the fourier transform necessarily.
I think the fourier transform might be a really approachable version because it is already in so much signal processing. Sometimes its periodicity can work against you.
From what I can tell you, what you need are:
1. invertible, identifiable basis
2. Something like Parseval's Identity
3. Able to "smooth" out things like the heaviside function or dirac deltas
4. Workable on graphs as well
5. decays at infinity
6. eigenfunctions are all orthonormal
Turns out, making something like that gets you something similar to the fourier transform, and the math is probably the simplest since you are working with easy exponentials that work nicely with convolution.
People have done similar work with Chebyshev polynomials, and there are actually a lot of applications in ML/AI using Chebyshev polynomials in graphical neural networks and triangulation.
edit:
The fourier transform also comes about pretty nicely in quantum mechanics because of poisson bracket stuff and its nice derivative properties for position-momentum space. I am don't think other transforms/function basis come out so naturally.
- dylan604 3y agoThis is a great example why maths people can't carry on conversations with non-maths people. I'm sure everything you just said is very possibly true, but I have no idea. This would be like me asking ChatGPT a question, and it all sounds believable, but I have no way of checking if it is true.
- kaba0 3y agoWhy do you expect to understand an expert’s talk, without yourself being knowledgeable about the topic/subject? With all due respect, this cockyness is unfortunately quite common with software developers (myself included), as if being good at one thing automatically translates to a different domain. Nobel disease, but even without the Nobel-price?
- selimthegrim 3y agoHave you got some references on the Chebyshev applications?
- SpaceManNabs 3y agohttps://github.com/mdeff/cnn_graph/issues/35 https://github.com/mdeff/cnn_graph/issues/35 Gcns
- SpaceManNabs 3y agoActually you dont need 5. just boundary conditions or decay.