4 ms·
> Russian rockets as well just few years back because it was cheaper Your link says that US had no homegrown option, when it used russian rockets. The only pa
by falserum 3y ago
> Russian rockets as well just few years back because it was cheaper
Your link says that US had no homegrown option, when it used russian rockets.
The only part that matches “because cheaper”, was atlas rockets using soviet engines, but that also had additional reasoning of keeping russian rocket engineers away from iran and north Korea.
So overall,
US definitely will subsidise a US company. (If not spacex, then other company which demonstrates competence)
Strategically it is a must have capability. If you depend on others, you open your self up for bunch of risks.
- YetAnotherNick 3y agoUS had space shuttle which was the better in most of the metrics compared to Russia except cost. They knowingly discarded it because Russian rockets were cheaper.