3 ms·
No, to castigate the effort is precisely helpful in a case where it results in a gross violation of privacy — potentially even impact constitutional rights dire
by ccamrobertson 3y ago
No, to castigate the effort is precisely helpful in a case where it results in a gross violation of privacy — potentially even impact constitutional rights directly.
The entire point of this article is that other news sources and “fact checkers” are being obtuse (or simply lying) to deny the fact that a kill switch has been called for.
This is typical Overton window bullshit; “no, no, that’s not what they want to do,” and of course five years later it’s completely apparent that indeed we have implicit (and probably even explicit) kill switches in cars.
- JoeAltmaier 3y agoA gross violation is, driving drunk and killing somebody. Wave the 'rights' flag all you like, dead is dead and that flag is much, much bigger.
- major505 3y agoSo a guy drive drunk and aleneryboyldy pays the price ? Some phone scammer calls a old lady and steeals all her retirement money, now because of that the government can hear all your phone conversations? Nice try glowie.
- major505 3y agoThere's already solutions for drunk drivers. Nca4sntust can be pny turned on if you blown in the device that measure y9ur alcohol blood level , and eve the.proibition of drivin, by removing the jndividual permission.