3 ms·
Certainly for my own scripts it's a lot less than "99%". It won't even run on most of them as it will just exit on some fatal error: Special variables like $ar
by arp242 3y ago
Certainly for my own scripts it's a lot less than "99%". It won't even run on most of them as it will just exit on some fatal error:
Special variables like $argv and $status.
Most array things (e.g. ${(o)arr} for an ordered array)
(( .. )) conditionals
"short loops" without "do".
repeat loops.
You could rewrite these things, but what errors remain where shellcheck is helpful in zsh?
- pseudo_meta 3y agowell, for me it's 99%. But true, I don't use short loops, and I also don't use array a lot (when I feel the needs to use arrays, I switch to a different language anyway). "what errors remain" is hard for me to say – I get a wide variety of helpful errors, regularly.
- arp242 3y agoEven in simple scripts I found arrays to be very helpful once I let go of the "POSIX sh mindset" and was used to it. The way word-splitting and $IFS works is basically like an "implicit array", as is $@, $1, etc. (actually in zsh $@ is an array: $1, $@[1], $*[1], and $argv[1] are all the same), so everyone already uses arrays. It replaces a lot of uses of cut and "awk '{print $2}" for starters.