3 ms·
It's a pain point for people who want to see it succeed. It's like the mole guy from Austin powers. Just because it's free doesn't make it good enough. It's not
by graphe 3y ago
It's a pain point for people who want to see it succeed. It's like the mole guy from Austin powers. Just because it's free doesn't make it good enough. It's not hard to pirate Photoshop, which is also free. Krita is a better Photoshop replacement than gimp is.
- doublerabbit 3y agoKrita is new, GIMP is legacy. It's a hard and very time consuming tax to replace UI within a legacy application. GIMP has existed long before the entitled generation of Linuxers who wish for everything to be handed to them on a golden plate. However sometimes that plate is covered in muck that you need to clean yourself.
- oblio 3y ago> GIMP has existed long before the entitled generation of Linuxers who wish for everything to be handed to them on a golden plate. I've been there before the golden platter, and the Gimp UI was mediocre even back then. And even underneath, Gimp is at best bronze, I wouldn't call it gold :-)
- graphe 3y agoKrita isn't that new. Between using another program and fixing the gimp UI, most graphics people aren't going to learn to program because they love GIMP so much. It's nice that people still try GIMP, once everyone 'knows' GIMP's UI sucks they'll just use krita for everything and it'll be forgotten.
- jdiff 3y agoKrita is old, Blender is old, both have improved themselves with age and thougtful change. GIMP has done nothing but fossilize with age.