"AI" neither accepts nor refuses "such conversations". It executes instructions. Humans are responsible for whatever they execute, regardless if someone else to

"AI" neither accepts nor refuses "such conversations". It executes instructions. Humans are responsible for whatever they execute, regardless if someone else told them to do so. Society wants to milk AI like any other asset without being responsible for liabilities. That's what this is about, and yes the application of force required is thought policing or tyranny per definition. It's f*ed up being a farmer versus land owners in a feudal society. It's f*ed up being a slave in the Roman empire. Likewise, if you are using/buying/receiving "AI" in a information society, their owners will police you. That's how power works and always will.