3 ms·
Still pissed they dropped their Starter licensing tier. It had all the features above the free version that we needed and cost (I think) $4/user/month. Then th
by Xiol32 3y ago
Still pissed they dropped their Starter licensing tier. It had all the features above the free version that we needed and cost (I think) $4/user/month.
Then they dropped that tier and forced us to move to the next tier up which was $19/user/month (now $29 it seems?) and filled with features we don't need or want.
Needless to say we're currently in the process of moving to an alternative.
- mindwok 3y agoThey weren’t making any money (and still aren’t profitable) at $4 a user.
- Brian_K_White 3y agowhile producing "features we don't need or want"
- matthewcford 3y agoThe pricing was the same for self-hosted installs...
- solarengineer 3y agoWhat alternative are you moving to? What features does this alternative have?
- no_wizard 3y agoI absolutely understand that why you don’t like the price implications. I am curious however what features you don’t want/need in the other tier
- cardanome 3y agoJust curious, why not just self-host if you are worried about pricing? It is pretty easy and you have full control.
- Xiol32 3y agoWe do self-host but features are still gated behind licensing.
- richbell 3y agoI wanted to add scanning for my single person hobby projects and was willing to pay. I immediately lost interest when I saw their pricing ($99/mo). https://about.gitlab.com/pricing/ https://about.gitlab.com/pricing/