3 ms·
Morality discussion aside, isn't this anti-competitive? Instead of passing a law for all carriers, the govt picked a winner and gave them money?
by TriangleEdge 3y ago
Morality discussion aside, isn't this anti-competitive? Instead of passing a law for all carriers, the govt picked a winner and gave them money?
- sandworm101 3y ago>> the govt picked a winner and gave them money? That is what government procurement means. Any competitive process comes before the award of the contract. After that point everyone is generally locked into a one-customer one-seller situation.
- mcmcmc 3y agoJust because it’s how it’s done doesn’t mean it’s not anti-competitive. Government procurement should be sourcing from multiple vendors and requiring interoperability from all of them. Otherwise it’s way too easy for megacorps to lobby their way into a contract and offer products at a loss before cranking up replacement and repair costs by a 10,000% markup since the govt has no choice but to pay it.