I wonder. After all, this is a demonstration on how the British could have identified, and stopped key players in a rebellion, yes? And you think people will

I wonder. After all, this is a demonstration on how the British could have identified, and stopped key players in a rebellion, yes? And you think people will be upset about the concept? This is a poor example to use. edit: I see lots of downvoting, but people... be realistic. The average person will only see that a rebellion could be stopped. This isn't an example which explains negative outcomes to them well. People will give up all due to fear. Hell, people will give up all privacy to Google for beads and trinkets! And this example shows a government being able to thrwart an actual, violent rebellion! The average Sally and Joe will think "great"!