5 ms·

Might be smaller lately because what's produced nowadays is crap. Things exciting this year came from Stones and Beatles, you figure :) We have Spotify family

by gokhan 3y ago

Might be smaller lately because what's produced nowadays is crap. Things exciting this year came from Stones and Beatles, you figure :) We have Spotify family subscription, always listening one of us' playlist at the dinner table and almost all of it created before 2000, and most before 1990. I'm talking about one 16yo, one 11 yo and two adults. Recently, 16yo started his A levels here in London. The whole class created a playlist with their fav songs from all genres, 70+ teenagers. Hardly 10% of it is post 2000. Kids' family backgrounds are as diverse as it gets.

jncfhnb 3y ago
London must be yearning for the older times
ivan_gammel 3y ago
> Might be smaller lately because what's produced nowadays is crap. Things exciting this year came from Stones and Beatles, you figure It is a matter of personal taste, curiosity and influence of people around you. There’s a lot of good music and good songs that were written in this century and in the last 10 years. However, this period of time is very small compared to the time passed since great classical music works were created. No wonder its share is small.
klyrs 3y ago
You're describing your bubble. In mine, young women rappers are being discovered in droves, previously on youtube and now tiktok. They don't have Death Row tier production quality, but by the time they make it to Spotify, they're putting out bangers. It's little surprise that your nuclear family listens to such a narrow range of music. Growing up, I didn't listen to new music in the house either. We had classical, old country, ragtime, and big band -- nothing newer than 30 years ago. My parents thought everything else was noise. Oh, and funny thing, I've recently discovered artists from the 90s that I never heard of back then. Music discovery is, in my experience, in a golden era. There's not only a huge amount of new music, but as old music makes it online, it's making it to my ears.
- gizajob 3y ago
  “70+ teenagers” in London - Europe’s most diverse city. I don’t believe there’s a need for the condescending implication about the poster’s “nuclear family” or “bubble” and I’d posit that a majority of those teenagers don’t live in nuclear families. This is a much broader phenomenon. Young people will always find new music to listen to, but there is a crisis in musical innovation in the 21st century, essentially whereby any new music made within it cannot escape from the patterns laid down in the 20th century. Teenagers are likely listening to pre-2000 music because there is simply no 21st century music to be had.
  - klyrs 3y ago
    Your argument is ridiculous on its face. Modern music has thrown out the very nature of musicality. Bartók is considered unlistenable by most people to this day, and he died in 1945. Kids these days are circuit bending, producing a noisome din without rhythm, melody, or anything remotely pleasing to your ear. And yet, I've been to packed concerts (albeit tiny venues). The shackles of the second millennium are thrown off. What is free jazz, anyway? What's the crisis? Your sample size is pathetically small, an appeal to the diversity of London (pfft, I scoff from the diversity of the urban centers of the Pacific Northwest) does nothing to reinforce your claim. Your bubble, my friend, is small. There is no crisis. You claim that there is no Doechii, that Nicole Lizee is dead, that Lil Nas X never existed. And I cannot hear you.
    - gizajob 3y ago
      I feel like you’re talking to yourself. By all means tell us what free jazz is, and whether anything recent has bettered it for quality or freeness compared to jazz of the 20th century. And do take a trip to London one day if you need to understand what diversity looks like in a world metropolis before lecturing. You also have zero information about what might be pleasing to my ear. Listen to this while you’re cogitating your next blustering response, it’s better than Death Row: https://youtu.be/ukZYP5Dy43E?si=gV5Cljo8iIh86tLO https://youtu.be/ukZYP5Dy43E?si=gV5Cljo8iIh86tLO
scarface_74 3y ago
There has always been a lot of crap. The reason people think it was better in the old days because most of the crap was forgotten and is not played on the oldies station. I read somewhere that the typical “classics” station whether it be RnB, Motown, Rock, etc has a playlist of 300 songs. There were many more songs produced during the covered era
- strunz 3y ago
  This is such a tired argument. Even the "crap" back then had professional songwriters and musicians playing actual instruments with some semblance of artistry. Go listen to the global top 50 on Spotify and it's hard to even call it music. It's generally the same trap/reggaeton beat with some autogenerated ambient sounds and someone mumbling in triplets over it. Almost none of it is memorable or original, and has very little artistic merit IMO. It's basically AI generated emotionless bytes.
  - scarface_74 3y ago
    Old people have always complained about music of this generation being crap. Even in my lifetime, people complained about rap music of the early 80s and the 90s that are now considered classics. Tipper Gore was up in arms about NWA (Dr. Dre is now considered a legend and Ice Cube is making family movies) and Ice T. And even in the modern area as hip hop has become mainstream I remember people complaining that the pop charts had too many rappers. People complained about Elvis and the Beatles when they were first coming out. Do you think your parents wouldn’t say the same about the music you listened to growing up? I know my parents thought the rap music I listened to were crap.
  - troupo 3y ago
    > Even the "crap" back then had professional songwriters and musicians playing actual instruments Ah, you mean the same four chords in succession: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5pidokakU4I https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5pidokakU4I
    - strunz 3y ago
bryanlarsen 3y ago
Sturgeon's law: 90% of everything is crap. There was lots of crap pre-2000, you just never hear it.

by gokhan 3y ago

jncfhnb 3y ago

London must be yearning for the older times

ivan_gammel 3y ago

> Might be smaller lately because what's produced nowadays is crap. Things exciting this year came from Stones and Beatles, you figure It is a matter of personal taste, curiosity and influence of people around you. There’s a lot of good music and good songs that were written in this century and in the last 10 years. However, this period of time is very small compared to the time passed since great classical music works were created. No wonder its share is small.

klyrs 3y ago

You're describing your bubble. In mine, young women rappers are being discovered in droves, previously on youtube and now tiktok. They don't have Death Row tier production quality, but by the time they make it to Spotify, they're putting out bangers. It's little surprise that your nuclear family listens to such a narrow range of music. Growing up, I didn't listen to new music in the house either. We had classical, old country, ragtime, and big band -- nothing newer than 30 years ago. My parents thought everything else was noise. Oh, and funny thing, I've recently discovered artists from the 90s that I never heard of back then. Music discovery is, in my experience, in a golden era. There's not only a huge amount of new music, but as old music makes it online, it's making it to my ears.

gizajob 3y ago
“70+ teenagers” in London - Europe’s most diverse city. I don’t believe there’s a need for the condescending implication about the poster’s “nuclear family” or “bubble” and I’d posit that a majority of those teenagers don’t live in nuclear families. This is a much broader phenomenon. Young people will always find new music to listen to, but there is a crisis in musical innovation in the 21st century, essentially whereby any new music made within it cannot escape from the patterns laid down in the 20th century. Teenagers are likely listening to pre-2000 music because there is simply no 21st century music to be had.
- klyrs 3y ago
  Your argument is ridiculous on its face. Modern music has thrown out the very nature of musicality. Bartók is considered unlistenable by most people to this day, and he died in 1945. Kids these days are circuit bending, producing a noisome din without rhythm, melody, or anything remotely pleasing to your ear. And yet, I've been to packed concerts (albeit tiny venues). The shackles of the second millennium are thrown off. What is free jazz, anyway? What's the crisis? Your sample size is pathetically small, an appeal to the diversity of London (pfft, I scoff from the diversity of the urban centers of the Pacific Northwest) does nothing to reinforce your claim. Your bubble, my friend, is small. There is no crisis. You claim that there is no Doechii, that Nicole Lizee is dead, that Lil Nas X never existed. And I cannot hear you.
  - gizajob 3y ago
    I feel like you’re talking to yourself. By all means tell us what free jazz is, and whether anything recent has bettered it for quality or freeness compared to jazz of the 20th century. And do take a trip to London one day if you need to understand what diversity looks like in a world metropolis before lecturing. You also have zero information about what might be pleasing to my ear. Listen to this while you’re cogitating your next blustering response, it’s better than Death Row: https://youtu.be/ukZYP5Dy43E?si=gV5Cljo8iIh86tLO https://youtu.be/ukZYP5Dy43E?si=gV5Cljo8iIh86tLO

scarface_74 3y ago

There has always been a lot of crap. The reason people think it was better in the old days because most of the crap was forgotten and is not played on the oldies station. I read somewhere that the typical “classics” station whether it be RnB, Motown, Rock, etc has a playlist of 300 songs. There were many more songs produced during the covered era

strunz 3y ago
This is such a tired argument. Even the "crap" back then had professional songwriters and musicians playing actual instruments with some semblance of artistry. Go listen to the global top 50 on Spotify and it's hard to even call it music. It's generally the same trap/reggaeton beat with some autogenerated ambient sounds and someone mumbling in triplets over it. Almost none of it is memorable or original, and has very little artistic merit IMO. It's basically AI generated emotionless bytes.
- scarface_74 3y ago
  Old people have always complained about music of this generation being crap. Even in my lifetime, people complained about rap music of the early 80s and the 90s that are now considered classics. Tipper Gore was up in arms about NWA (Dr. Dre is now considered a legend and Ice Cube is making family movies) and Ice T. And even in the modern area as hip hop has become mainstream I remember people complaining that the pop charts had too many rappers. People complained about Elvis and the Beatles when they were first coming out. Do you think your parents wouldn’t say the same about the music you listened to growing up? I know my parents thought the rap music I listened to were crap.
- troupo 3y ago
  > Even the "crap" back then had professional songwriters and musicians playing actual instruments Ah, you mean the same four chords in succession: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5pidokakU4I https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5pidokakU4I
  - strunz 3y ago

bryanlarsen 3y ago

Sturgeon's law: 90% of everything is crap. There was lots of crap pre-2000, you just never hear it.