3 ms·
That would actually also incentivize the greatest emitters to come up with more efficient methods of capturing CO2.
by inglor_cz 3y ago
That would actually also incentivize the greatest emitters to come up with more efficient methods of capturing CO2.
- empyrrhicist 3y agoOr, more cheaply, non-emitting alternatives
- inglor_cz 3y agoCombination of both makes the most sense. There won't likely be battery-based passenger jets anytime soon, for example. Meanwhile, humanity is so mixed up that "everyone" has some family members far away and it would be cruel to deny them the travel. In that scenario, let the airline think about carbon capture, too.
- empyrrhicist 3y agoI mean, sure - I don't think banning CC is sensible. I just have thermodynamic doubts about whether it's ever going to make much sense, and in the short term it seems to be a ploy by fossil fuel interests.