3 ms·
I am very serious. If anything I said was factually incorrect, please correct me.
by RecycledEle 3y ago
I am very serious.
If anything I said was factually incorrect, please correct me.
- pvg 3y agohttps://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&query=by%3Adang%20fact%20red%20herring&sort=byDate&type=comment https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&que... The fact is the HN guidelines ask you not to try to start offtopic flamewars, no matter how serious or factual you believe you are.
- RecycledEle 3y agoI'm not trying to change the topic. OP referred to "Adversarial Testing for LLMs and Chatbots" I'm not trying to start a flamewar. This is an honest observation: I find it odd that people talk about "alignment" and some of them brag about "unalingned" AIs when only mentioning a few tests such as romatic role play, or giving instructions to build a bomb. IMO, these are not good tests for alignment. I wonder if we could take some ethics tests from various fields that are designed to test if someone knows what is legal and what is illegal, and check the AI against those tests. Alternately, I wonder if we could give an AI quizzes on what the laws say.
- pvg 3y agoThat's all fine but your comment swerved to a completely different controversy in bombastic terms and the guidelines and zillions of HN moderation comments ask you not to do that. It's not complicated or difficult to avoid doing that and you should.
- RecycledEle 3y agoPlease show me these moderation comments. Are you claiming to be a HN moderator?
- RecycledEle 3y agoI see from a Google search that you and dang work together. I see from your user profile you have been on HN since 2009. I did not mean to offend you. I see things from a different point of view.
- RecycledEle 3y agoTo clarify: Those posts by "dang" are not about or to me. I have been here about 10 months. Those are 1 to 3 years old.