3 ms·

I was going to mention that an official solution to this problem is around the corner, but the corresponding PEP has been rejected. Anyone know what happened th

• jefferph 3y ago
  Looks like https://peps.python.org/pep-0723/ https://peps.python.org/pep-0723/ was accepted instead. See discussion here: https://discuss.python.org/t/pep-722-723-decision/36763 https://discuss.python.org/t/pep-722-723-decision/36763
  • Flimm 3y ago
    Fascinating! It looks like PEP 723 (the one that was accepted provisionally) will allow you to embed a comment in your script that looks like this, to specify dependencies on request and rich: # /// pyproject # [run] # requires-python = ">=3.11" # dependencies = [ # "requests<3", # "rich", # ] # /// import requests from rich.pretty import pprint resp = requests.get("https://peps.python.org/api/peps.json") data = resp.json() pprint([(k, v["title"]) for k, v in data.items()][:10])