From what I understand, JM doesn't believe in legitimate and immediate claims. He believes that nation states act in their own best interest and that the strong

From what I understand, JM doesn't believe in legitimate and immediate claims. He believes that nation states act in their own best interest and that the stronger party generally wins. It's not a statement about morality, it's trying to be objective. You on the other hand, not only do you lay out a heart throbbing argument full of moral claims but you severely misunderstand the argument you're even arguing against. You don't have to agree with JM but at least make sure you understand what he's talking about.