2 ms·
Hey, neat! Edit: looking at the whole conversation, it did recognize the problem but then it got the answer wrong. Interesting.
by water-data-dude 3y ago
Hey, neat!
Edit: looking at the whole conversation, it did recognize the problem but then it got the answer wrong. Interesting.
- bananapub 3y agowhy is that interesting? it's a text suffix generator - you wouldn't expect it to generate a correct answer for a logic puzzle that isn't in it's training data.
- grogenaut 3y agothis is the point of the thread, people are expecting it to do so as they're not understanding how it works or what it is
- bananapub 3y agoit's the point of basically every discussion on HN about this. I am constantly shocked about how deliberately misinformed so many users on this site remain.
- water-data-dude 3y agoI was just impressed that it was so convincing for the first chunk - it’s cool that it was able to seem so “solid”, even if superficially. I’ve been out of the loop for a while and stuff’s been moving fast!