5 ms·
I’d say calling it “debunked” is disingenuous. Sure it was a long shot, but the early results showed some chance that is was a real effect. But similar to the L
by elcritch 3y ago
I’d say calling it “debunked” is disingenuous. Sure it was a long shot, but the early results showed some chance that is was a real effect. But similar to the LHC’s “superluminal data” it was examined. Sometimes scientific advancement happens in unexpected places.
In the end some labs did some really cool experimental work with micro-newton forces and self heating apparatus to show that it didn’t work.