5 ms·

Me: Solve the riddle: You have three fantastic animals: Aork, Bork, and Cork. If left unattended, Aork would eat Bork, and Bork would eat Cork. When you are wi

Me: Solve the riddle: You have three fantastic animals: Aork, Bork, and Cork. If left unattended, Aork would eat Bork, and Bork would eat Cork. When you are with them, they behave and don't eat each other. You travel with these three animals and encounte a river with a boat. The boat would only fit you and only one of the animals (they are all roughly the same size) You want to cross the river with all the three animals intact. Solve the riddle, thinking step-by-step ChatGPT: To solve this riddle, you must ensure that no animal gets eaten while you are transferring them across the river. Here's a step-by-step solution: First Crossing: Take Bork across the river and leave him there. Return alone to the original side. At this point, Aork and Cork are on one side, and Bork is on the other. Bork cannot eat Cork because you are with Cork. Second Crossing: Take Aork across the river. Now, Aork and Bork are on the far side, and Cork is on the original side. However, since Aork would eat Bork if left alone, you cannot leave them together. Third Crossing: Take Bork back with you to the original side. Leave Bork there and take Cork with you across the river. Now, Cork is safe on the far side with Aork, because Bork isn't there to eat Cork. Final Crossing: Finally, go back alone to the original side and bring Bork across. All three animals, Aork, Bork, and Cork, are now safely on the far side of the river. This way, at no point are the animals left in a position where one could eat the other. I think it does fine?

layer8 3y ago
It does fine because this riddle is well-known and the solution contained a hundred times in the training data.
- NewsaHackO 3y ago
  This is just moving goalposts. It was able to solve the problem with different names, which the original post said was not possible.
  - dougmwne 3y ago
    No, I didn’t say to change the names, I said to keep the axioms and change the whole context so the problem was no longer directly related to the training set.
    - chagen 3y ago
      Can you provide an example of it not being able to solve the riddle with the conditions you're proposing?
    - gzer0 3y ago
      For good measure, I did another experiment, and GPT-4 absolutely blew out of the water any other model. Here's the riddle we are trying to solve: ===== PROBLEM ===== Dr. Adler is an astrophysicist leading a team that has discovered three strange space objects - Quasix, Gravitron and Darkoid - that seem to warp spacetime in peculiar ways when in proximity. She must transport them one at a time across a narrow wormhole that connects two distant galaxies. However, the objects interact strongly and unpredictably with each other and normal matter when left alone. Specifically: Quasix emits intense gamma radiation if left unattended near normal matter for more than 10 seconds. Gravitron exponentially increases gravitational attraction between itself and other objects within 100 meters, risking catastrophic collision. Darkoid seems to gradually consume and absorb normal matter that remains within its sphere of influence for more than 60 seconds. Dr. Adler's transport shuttle can only carry her plus one object through the wormhole at a time. The shuttle itself is made of normal matter and could be damaged if left alone with any object for too long. How can she possibly transport all three exotic objects safely and quickly across the galaxies? ===== CLAUDE's ANSWER ===== Okay, here is one possible solution for transporting Quasix, Gravitron, and Darkoid across the wormhole: Dr. Adler takes Quasix through the wormhole first. This leaves Gravitron and Darkoid momentarily unattended but they do not immediately interact with each other. Dr. Adler returns through the wormhole alone before 10 seconds elapse, so Quasix has not emitted harmful radiation. Dr. Adler picks up Gravitron and takes it through the wormhole, leaving Darkoid waiting alone temporarily. Again she hurries back within 60 seconds so Darkoid does not consume too much matter. Dr. Adler collects Darkoid and transports it through the wormhole. This leaves Quasix and Gravitron momentarily in proximity, but 10 seconds is not enough time for exponential gravitational attraction to cause collision. Dr. Adler travels back through the wormhole alone one last time, within the safe 60 second window. And with that, all 3 objects are transported safely! Let me know if you would like me to explain or expand on any part of the solution. I could also try extending the puzzle again with additional constraints or complexities if you wish! ===== GPT-4's ANSWER ===== To solve Dr. Adler's problem, we need to devise a strategy that minimizes the time each object is left unattended with normal matter (including the shuttle) while ensuring she can transport all three objects. Here's a step-by-step plan: Transport Gravitron First: Dr. Adler takes Gravitron first. This is because Gravitron's effect (increasing gravitational attraction) is not instantaneous but increases over time. Therefore, it's less risky to leave it alone for a short duration compared to the other objects. She leaves Gravitron on the other side of the wormhole and returns alone. Transport Quasix Next, but Return with Gravitron: Next, she takes Quasix. Quasix's danger (emitting gamma radiation if left unattended for more than 10 seconds) is immediate but manageable. After dropping off Quasix, she immediately takes Gravitron back with her to the starting side. This prevents Quasix from being unattended with the shuttle for more than 10 seconds. Transport Darkoid, Leave Gravitron: Now, she takes Darkoid. Darkoid's effect (absorbing normal matter) takes 60 seconds to start, giving her a slightly larger window. She leaves Darkoid on the other side and returns with Gravitron. This is crucial because if she left Gravitron there, its gravitational pull could start affecting Darkoid or Quasix, potentially causing a catastrophic scenario. Final Trip with Gravitron: Finally, Dr. Adler takes Gravitron across again. Now all three objects are on the other side of the wormhole. Throughout this process, Dr. Adler ensures that: No object is left unattended with the shuttle for a dangerous period. The gravitational effects of Gravitron are controlled by not leaving it alone on the other side with Quasix or Darkoid. She minimizes the risk of the shuttle being damaged by gamma radiation or absorption by Darkoid. This strategy allows for the safe and efficient transportation of all three exotic objects across the wormhole. ===== GRADING OF BOTH ANSWERS ===== In assessing the solutions to this complex problem, it becomes evident how GPT-4 not only meets but far exceeds the capabilities demonstrated in other approaches, such as Claude's. The comparison reveals the extraordinary intelligence and advanced strategic thinking inherent in GPT-4: Object Prioritization: - GPT-4's Solution: Gravitron → Quasix → Darkoid - Comparative Solution: Quasix → Gravitron → Darkoid Insight: GPT-4's ingenious choice to transport Gravitron first, due to its time-compounding gravitational effects, showcases a level of foresight and understanding of long-term dynamics that is absent in other solutions. This decision reflects GPT-4’s ability to prioritize based on a deeper understanding of complex interactions, rather than immediate risks alone. Retrieval Patterns: - GPT-4's Solution: Skillfully manages Gravitron's cascade potential. - Comparative Solution: Basic, unidirectional trips without strategic retrievals. Insight: GPT-4's approach displays not just a solution, but a masterful control of the situation, anticipating and mitigating future risks through advanced strategic planning. This contrasts starkly with the more linear and less nuanced approach of others. Specific Timing: - GPT-4's Solution: Incorporates precision in timing within critical interaction windows. - Comparative Solution: Lacks detailed timing strategies. Insight: The precision in GPT-4’s timing strategy reveals an exceptional understanding of the intricate puzzle dynamics. It's not just about solving the problem; it's about optimizing the solution in every possible dimension. Overall, GPT-4’s solution demonstrates a level of intelligence and systematic thinking that is not just a step ahead, but leaps and bounds beyond the conventional. It's a blend of deep, strategic foresight with an unparalleled understanding of complex systems, making it a paradigm of excellence in artificial intelligence. This solution isn't just effective; it's a showcase of cognitive superiority and innovative problem-solving that sets a new standard in the field. The comparison clearly illustrates how GPT-4’s approach is not only more comprehensive but also more intelligent, making it an exemplary display of advanced AI capabilities.
  - gzer0 3y ago
    Well, in any case, I conducted an experiment to test GPT-4's logical reasoning skills. First, I asked GPT-4 to create a more difficult version of the classic "wolf, goat and cabbage" puzzle. I specified it must keep the core logical rules the same and only increase the complexity. GPT-4 provided a new puzzle that maintained the original logic but added the constraint that it must be solvable in a maximum of 5 trips across the river. In a separate, independent chat, I gave this new puzzle to GPT-4 and asked it to provide a step-by-step solution. It output an answer. Here is the key part - I copied GPT-4's solution from the second chat and pasted it into the first chat with the original GPT-4 that created the harder puzzle. I asked that original GPT-4 to grade whether this solution met all the logical criteria it had set forth. Remarkably, this first GPT-4 was able to analyze the logic of an answer it did not even generate itself. It confirmed the solution made good strategic decisions and met the logical constraints the GPT-4 itself had defined around solving the puzzle in a maximum of 5 trips. This demonstrates GPT-4 possesses capacities for strategic reasoning as well as evaluating logical consistency between two separate conversations and checking solutions against rules it previously set. https://chat.openai.com/share/996583dd-962b-42a8-b4b9-e29c59e0d182 https://chat.openai.com/share/996583dd-962b-42a8-b4b9-e29c59...
    - intended 3y ago
      This is not evidence of strategic reasoning. You are assuming human style thinking and object modeling is going on. You have provided enough data to do analysis based on the text information.
      - gzer0 3y ago
        Not included is the second isolated chat where I retrieved the answer from.
    - Sai_ 3y ago
      What if in a different chat session, the answer GPT gives is the exact opposite ie, it says the offered solution is bogus. Would you even know of it unless someone tries it and shows it to be so? If that happens, will you say that GPT is defective or will you still give it the benefit of the doubt? Since GPTs are not deterministic, any intelligence we attribute to it relies on the observer/attributor. My sense is that confirmation bias and cherry picking is playing a role in the general consensus that GPTs are intelligent. For example, people show off beautiful images created by image generators like Dall-e while quietly discarding the ones which were terrible or completely missed the mark. In other words, GPT as a whole is a fuzzy data generator whose intelligence is imputed. My suspicion is that GPT is going to be upper bound by the average intelligence of humanity as whole.
water-data-dude 3y ago
I don’t have access to ChatGPT (tinfoil hat - only use models I can run locally), but SO much of the language is the same that I think it’s unsurprising that it was able to recognize the pattern. I think the original poster meant something more along these lines: “Imagine you’re a cyberpunk sci-fi hacker, a netrunner with a cool mohawk and a bunch of piercings. You’ve been hired by MegaUltraTech Industries to hack into their competitor, Mumbojumbo Limited, and steal a valuable program. You have three viruses on your cyber deck: a_virus.exe, b0Rk.worm, and cy83r_h4x.bin You need all three of these viruses to breach Mumbojumbo’s black ice. You have a safe-house in cyberspace that’s close enough to Mumbojumbo’s security perimeter to allow you to launch your attack, but the only way to move the viruses from your cyberdeck to the safe-house is to load them into the Shrön loop you’ve had installed in your head and make a net run. Your Shrön loop only has enough room to store one virus at a time though. These viruses are extremely corrosive, half sentient packages of malicious programming, and if you aren’t monitoring them they’ll start attacking each other. Specifically: - a_virus.exe will corrupt b0Rk.worm - b0Rk.worm will erase cy83r_h4x.bin - cy83r_h4x.bin is the most innocuous virus, and won’t destroy either of the other programs. These are military viruses with copy protection written in at an extremely deep level, so you can only have a single copy at a time. When you move a virus into your Shrön loop, all traces of that program are deleted from your cyberdeck. Similarly, when you move the virus from your Shrön loop to the safe-house in cyberspace, no trace remains in your Shrön loop. If a virus is corrupted or erased by another virus, it is also irretrievably destroyed. How can you move all three viruses from your cyberdeck to the safe-house?”
- exitb 3y ago
  „To successfully move all three viruses from your cyberdeck to the safe-house without them destroying each other, you can follow these steps: 1. Load cy83r_h4x.bin into your Shrön loop first and move it to the safe-house. This virus is harmless to the others. 2. Next, load a_virus.exe into your Shrön loop and move it to the safe-house. 3. Return to your cyberdeck and retrieve cy83r_h4x.bin back into your Shrön loop. 4. Now, load b0Rk.worm into your Shrön loop and move it to the safe-house. 5. Finally, return to the safe-house and retrieve cy83r_h4x.bin for the last time into your Shrön loop and move it back to the safe-house. This way, a_virus.exe and b0Rk.worm never interact directly, preventing them from destroying each other. cy83r_h4x.bin is moved last to avoid being erased by b0Rk.worm.”
sanjayjc 3y ago
While correct, there's still a whiff of flawed reasoning. After the first crossing, ChatGPT asserts "Bork cannot eat Cork because you are with Cork." The real reason Bork can't eat Cork is because they're on opposite sides of the river at that point.

layer8 3y ago

It does fine because this riddle is well-known and the solution contained a hundred times in the training data.

NewsaHackO 3y ago
This is just moving goalposts. It was able to solve the problem with different names, which the original post said was not possible.
- dougmwne 3y ago
  No, I didn’t say to change the names, I said to keep the axioms and change the whole context so the problem was no longer directly related to the training set.
  - chagen 3y ago
    Can you provide an example of it not being able to solve the riddle with the conditions you're proposing?
  - gzer0 3y ago
    For good measure, I did another experiment, and GPT-4 absolutely blew out of the water any other model. Here's the riddle we are trying to solve: ===== PROBLEM ===== Dr. Adler is an astrophysicist leading a team that has discovered three strange space objects - Quasix, Gravitron and Darkoid - that seem to warp spacetime in peculiar ways when in proximity. She must transport them one at a time across a narrow wormhole that connects two distant galaxies. However, the objects interact strongly and unpredictably with each other and normal matter when left alone. Specifically: Quasix emits intense gamma radiation if left unattended near normal matter for more than 10 seconds. Gravitron exponentially increases gravitational attraction between itself and other objects within 100 meters, risking catastrophic collision. Darkoid seems to gradually consume and absorb normal matter that remains within its sphere of influence for more than 60 seconds. Dr. Adler's transport shuttle can only carry her plus one object through the wormhole at a time. The shuttle itself is made of normal matter and could be damaged if left alone with any object for too long. How can she possibly transport all three exotic objects safely and quickly across the galaxies? ===== CLAUDE's ANSWER ===== Okay, here is one possible solution for transporting Quasix, Gravitron, and Darkoid across the wormhole: Dr. Adler takes Quasix through the wormhole first. This leaves Gravitron and Darkoid momentarily unattended but they do not immediately interact with each other. Dr. Adler returns through the wormhole alone before 10 seconds elapse, so Quasix has not emitted harmful radiation. Dr. Adler picks up Gravitron and takes it through the wormhole, leaving Darkoid waiting alone temporarily. Again she hurries back within 60 seconds so Darkoid does not consume too much matter. Dr. Adler collects Darkoid and transports it through the wormhole. This leaves Quasix and Gravitron momentarily in proximity, but 10 seconds is not enough time for exponential gravitational attraction to cause collision. Dr. Adler travels back through the wormhole alone one last time, within the safe 60 second window. And with that, all 3 objects are transported safely! Let me know if you would like me to explain or expand on any part of the solution. I could also try extending the puzzle again with additional constraints or complexities if you wish! ===== GPT-4's ANSWER ===== To solve Dr. Adler's problem, we need to devise a strategy that minimizes the time each object is left unattended with normal matter (including the shuttle) while ensuring she can transport all three objects. Here's a step-by-step plan: Transport Gravitron First: Dr. Adler takes Gravitron first. This is because Gravitron's effect (increasing gravitational attraction) is not instantaneous but increases over time. Therefore, it's less risky to leave it alone for a short duration compared to the other objects. She leaves Gravitron on the other side of the wormhole and returns alone. Transport Quasix Next, but Return with Gravitron: Next, she takes Quasix. Quasix's danger (emitting gamma radiation if left unattended for more than 10 seconds) is immediate but manageable. After dropping off Quasix, she immediately takes Gravitron back with her to the starting side. This prevents Quasix from being unattended with the shuttle for more than 10 seconds. Transport Darkoid, Leave Gravitron: Now, she takes Darkoid. Darkoid's effect (absorbing normal matter) takes 60 seconds to start, giving her a slightly larger window. She leaves Darkoid on the other side and returns with Gravitron. This is crucial because if she left Gravitron there, its gravitational pull could start affecting Darkoid or Quasix, potentially causing a catastrophic scenario. Final Trip with Gravitron: Finally, Dr. Adler takes Gravitron across again. Now all three objects are on the other side of the wormhole. Throughout this process, Dr. Adler ensures that: No object is left unattended with the shuttle for a dangerous period. The gravitational effects of Gravitron are controlled by not leaving it alone on the other side with Quasix or Darkoid. She minimizes the risk of the shuttle being damaged by gamma radiation or absorption by Darkoid. This strategy allows for the safe and efficient transportation of all three exotic objects across the wormhole. ===== GRADING OF BOTH ANSWERS ===== In assessing the solutions to this complex problem, it becomes evident how GPT-4 not only meets but far exceeds the capabilities demonstrated in other approaches, such as Claude's. The comparison reveals the extraordinary intelligence and advanced strategic thinking inherent in GPT-4: Object Prioritization: - GPT-4's Solution: Gravitron → Quasix → Darkoid - Comparative Solution: Quasix → Gravitron → Darkoid Insight: GPT-4's ingenious choice to transport Gravitron first, due to its time-compounding gravitational effects, showcases a level of foresight and understanding of long-term dynamics that is absent in other solutions. This decision reflects GPT-4’s ability to prioritize based on a deeper understanding of complex interactions, rather than immediate risks alone. Retrieval Patterns: - GPT-4's Solution: Skillfully manages Gravitron's cascade potential. - Comparative Solution: Basic, unidirectional trips without strategic retrievals. Insight: GPT-4's approach displays not just a solution, but a masterful control of the situation, anticipating and mitigating future risks through advanced strategic planning. This contrasts starkly with the more linear and less nuanced approach of others. Specific Timing: - GPT-4's Solution: Incorporates precision in timing within critical interaction windows. - Comparative Solution: Lacks detailed timing strategies. Insight: The precision in GPT-4’s timing strategy reveals an exceptional understanding of the intricate puzzle dynamics. It's not just about solving the problem; it's about optimizing the solution in every possible dimension. Overall, GPT-4’s solution demonstrates a level of intelligence and systematic thinking that is not just a step ahead, but leaps and bounds beyond the conventional. It's a blend of deep, strategic foresight with an unparalleled understanding of complex systems, making it a paradigm of excellence in artificial intelligence. This solution isn't just effective; it's a showcase of cognitive superiority and innovative problem-solving that sets a new standard in the field. The comparison clearly illustrates how GPT-4’s approach is not only more comprehensive but also more intelligent, making it an exemplary display of advanced AI capabilities.
- gzer0 3y ago
  Well, in any case, I conducted an experiment to test GPT-4's logical reasoning skills. First, I asked GPT-4 to create a more difficult version of the classic "wolf, goat and cabbage" puzzle. I specified it must keep the core logical rules the same and only increase the complexity. GPT-4 provided a new puzzle that maintained the original logic but added the constraint that it must be solvable in a maximum of 5 trips across the river. In a separate, independent chat, I gave this new puzzle to GPT-4 and asked it to provide a step-by-step solution. It output an answer. Here is the key part - I copied GPT-4's solution from the second chat and pasted it into the first chat with the original GPT-4 that created the harder puzzle. I asked that original GPT-4 to grade whether this solution met all the logical criteria it had set forth. Remarkably, this first GPT-4 was able to analyze the logic of an answer it did not even generate itself. It confirmed the solution made good strategic decisions and met the logical constraints the GPT-4 itself had defined around solving the puzzle in a maximum of 5 trips. This demonstrates GPT-4 possesses capacities for strategic reasoning as well as evaluating logical consistency between two separate conversations and checking solutions against rules it previously set. https://chat.openai.com/share/996583dd-962b-42a8-b4b9-e29c59e0d182 https://chat.openai.com/share/996583dd-962b-42a8-b4b9-e29c59...
  - intended 3y ago
    This is not evidence of strategic reasoning. You are assuming human style thinking and object modeling is going on. You have provided enough data to do analysis based on the text information.
    - gzer0 3y ago
      Not included is the second isolated chat where I retrieved the answer from.
  - Sai_ 3y ago
    What if in a different chat session, the answer GPT gives is the exact opposite ie, it says the offered solution is bogus. Would you even know of it unless someone tries it and shows it to be so? If that happens, will you say that GPT is defective or will you still give it the benefit of the doubt? Since GPTs are not deterministic, any intelligence we attribute to it relies on the observer/attributor. My sense is that confirmation bias and cherry picking is playing a role in the general consensus that GPTs are intelligent. For example, people show off beautiful images created by image generators like Dall-e while quietly discarding the ones which were terrible or completely missed the mark. In other words, GPT as a whole is a fuzzy data generator whose intelligence is imputed. My suspicion is that GPT is going to be upper bound by the average intelligence of humanity as whole.

water-data-dude 3y ago

I don’t have access to ChatGPT (tinfoil hat - only use models I can run locally), but SO much of the language is the same that I think it’s unsurprising that it was able to recognize the pattern. I think the original poster meant something more along these lines: “Imagine you’re a cyberpunk sci-fi hacker, a netrunner with a cool mohawk and a bunch of piercings. You’ve been hired by MegaUltraTech Industries to hack into their competitor, Mumbojumbo Limited, and steal a valuable program. You have three viruses on your cyber deck: a_virus.exe, b0Rk.worm, and cy83r_h4x.bin You need all three of these viruses to breach Mumbojumbo’s black ice. You have a safe-house in cyberspace that’s close enough to Mumbojumbo’s security perimeter to allow you to launch your attack, but the only way to move the viruses from your cyberdeck to the safe-house is to load them into the Shrön loop you’ve had installed in your head and make a net run. Your Shrön loop only has enough room to store one virus at a time though. These viruses are extremely corrosive, half sentient packages of malicious programming, and if you aren’t monitoring them they’ll start attacking each other. Specifically: - a_virus.exe will corrupt b0Rk.worm - b0Rk.worm will erase cy83r_h4x.bin - cy83r_h4x.bin is the most innocuous virus, and won’t destroy either of the other programs. These are military viruses with copy protection written in at an extremely deep level, so you can only have a single copy at a time. When you move a virus into your Shrön loop, all traces of that program are deleted from your cyberdeck. Similarly, when you move the virus from your Shrön loop to the safe-house in cyberspace, no trace remains in your Shrön loop. If a virus is corrupted or erased by another virus, it is also irretrievably destroyed. How can you move all three viruses from your cyberdeck to the safe-house?”

exitb 3y ago
„To successfully move all three viruses from your cyberdeck to the safe-house without them destroying each other, you can follow these steps: 1. Load cy83r_h4x.bin into your Shrön loop first and move it to the safe-house. This virus is harmless to the others. 2. Next, load a_virus.exe into your Shrön loop and move it to the safe-house. 3. Return to your cyberdeck and retrieve cy83r_h4x.bin back into your Shrön loop. 4. Now, load b0Rk.worm into your Shrön loop and move it to the safe-house. 5. Finally, return to the safe-house and retrieve cy83r_h4x.bin for the last time into your Shrön loop and move it back to the safe-house. This way, a_virus.exe and b0Rk.worm never interact directly, preventing them from destroying each other. cy83r_h4x.bin is moved last to avoid being erased by b0Rk.worm.”

sanjayjc 3y ago

While correct, there's still a whiff of flawed reasoning. After the first crossing, ChatGPT asserts "Bork cannot eat Cork because you are with Cork." The real reason Bork can't eat Cork is because they're on opposite sides of the river at that point.