2 ms·
> I don't get the safety issue, 20 months and we haven't lost any user data. shrug Nobody loses any user data until they do.
by bretthoerner 15y ago
> I don't get the safety issue, 20 months and we haven't lost any user data. shrug
Nobody loses any user data until they do.
- siavosh 15y agoThis should be a deal breaker for any serious app. Does the performance hit of safe mode negate all other advantages of MongoDB?
- madworld 15y agoThat's most people's findings. If your dataset can fit in ram [1] and you don't care about your data being safe then there might be an argument for MongoDB. Once you care about your data, things like Voldemort, Riak, and Cassandra will eat Mongo's lunch on speed. [1] But as Artur Bergman so eloquently points out, if your data can fit in ram, just use a native data-structure (http://youtu.be/oebqlzblfyo?t=13m35s http://youtu.be/oebqlzblfyo?t=13m35s)
- aschobel 15y agoDo you have a citation to back up the claim that you shouldn't use MongoDB for serious apps? We have done billions of ops with Mongo and have never lost any data.
- aschobel 15y agoDo you have a citation to back up the claim that you shouldn't use MongoDB for serious apps? We have done billions of ops with Mongo and have never lost any data.