4 ms·
After 18 years at Google he's likely at a stage in his life where he's at f-you money in his bank account. If he cares more about the company culture than bein
by Fordec 3y ago
After 18 years at Google he's likely at a stage in his life where he's at f-you money in his bank account.
If he cares more about the company culture than being rehired by the people that disagree with his outlook, why not let it fly? If it instigates a culture change, he wins at the cost of a professional bridge he doesn't value anyway.
- cmrdporcupine 3y agoOne great way to lose the f-you money in your bank account is to get involved in a harassment or slander lawsuit because of some offhand things you said that got pasted all over the interwebs. I'm not saying that will happen here, but if I were writing this blog post I would have deliberately avoided specifics like this because of that, in part. It's one thing to legitimately trash Sundar Pichai; another to name some middle-level manager like that.
- utopcell 3y agoSince when is a VP middle-level management ?
- justin66 3y agoPretty much half the people who work at any given bank have some sort of "VP" title. "Middle-level" would be overestimating the standing of many with that title.
- utopcell 3y agoWhat a truly arbitrary comment. This is a conversation that is clearly about Google. What possible value did you think you added with what you wrote here.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- justin66 3y agoBad example, I guess. You wrote Since when is a VP middle-level management ? in reply to the parent commenter's observation It's one thing to legitimately trash Sundar Pichai; another to name some middle-level manager like that. A VP is very much middle-level management. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporate_title#Middle_management https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporate_title#Middle_managem... (a quick look at a Google org chart makes it look like, well, VPs are middle management there too)
- DannyBee 3y agoI'm not sure what org chart you looked at, but VP's make up less than 0.5% of the company.
- justin66 3y agoTo be clear, since I guess we're really drilling down on this: VP denotes senior management at Google? So Hixie's blog post wasn't really dumping on a random middle manager as cmdrporcupine (an ex-Googler, I think) suggested, which was the point of all this, but rather picking on a potential C-suite executive or something?
- DannyBee 3y agoYes, VP is senior management at Google. Statistically, middle management is L6 or L7 manager. VP is at least L10. It's not quite picking on a potential c-suite executive, but it's close. She's two steps away from c-suite, in a company of >180k people.
- justin66 3y agoThanks for the context. That’s a lot of layers of management you’ve got there.
- Fordec 3y agoZero risk of that. Libel requires proof, and having this go to court would require airing that proof in open court. If this is truthful at all and it only casts shade on one director, and retaliatory suits would be more harmful to the company and illuminating of internal affairs than this blog post. Any competent HR would much rather mediate in private. The point is, you weren't the person who wrote this. And I'm glad someone did. We need a little more scrutiny on how given people run industry leading ships aground despite making more in a year than some people make their entire lives.