They've been very careful not to and they were obviously right. They were very clearly mobbed by those who benefit from for-profit side which has more power and

They've been very careful not to and they were obviously right. They were very clearly mobbed by those who benefit from for-profit side which has more power and will determine what has to happen and how to make sure he can run a profit driven company that violates US law except on paper. The funny part is that this means there is no commercial board looking out for interests like those of stock holders, so the stock holders have basically put themselves in the position the board was in AFA no recourse if the CEO is selecting another interest over theirs as well. They want to know what the board knows but don't want the stock price to reflect it.